home    |   contact us

Hill Tribe Ecology & Educational Constraints

Their Ecology

By 200BC the Indo-Malay tribes of Vietnam and Laos were forced into the Annamite Mountain forests by invaders who seized the more fertile lowlands, hence the term "hill tribes."  The Annamites are the backbone of Indochina Peninsula and the southwestern portion of these mountains are in northeast Cambodia.  The original inhabitants of many other countries in the world's humid tropics were similarly compelled to live in forests. 

The banished cultures which survived did so "by accepting and working within the constraints of the natural processes associated with the year-round growing season and rapid ecological succession in the humid tropics." 1  Their environments became an "agroecosystem" consisting of various life supporting activities or subsystems the most important of which was/is agriculture.  The gathering of non timber forestry products such as bamboo, rattan, fruits, vegetables, honey, medicinals, etc. is another subsystem while hunting and fishing represent others.  These non agricultural subsystems provide many essentials and bartering materials moreover serve as a famine reserve in case of crop failure.

These mostly preliterate cultures possess highly complex and very specific knowledge of their local vegetation and wildlife developed over hundreds and in some cases thousands of years.  Their rich and reliable traditional knowledge base reflects the man-environment relationships necessary to meet their needs while sustaining earthly resources for future generations.  They resolved the issues of forestry management and maintenance of bio diversity many centuries ago. 

Due to the poor fertility of tropical forest soils particularly in the mountains, they developed shifting cultivation or swidden farming.  This is the practice of farming a crop field for a brief period of time and fallowing it for a much longer period.   The farmer or "swiddener" has a series of crop fields he rotates cultivating one at a time.  A crop field or "forest patch" is selected based on empirical criteria coupled with spiritual considerations.  To enable all families in the community to remain in close proximity to the primary forests for gathering, hunting, etc., crop fields are widely dispersed.  The usual method of clearing forest for a crop field is by felling trees and burning them along with other vegetation and ground litter to boost topsoil fertility.  

These people are known as "integral" swiddeners and in Asia consist of the tribal ethnic minorities which include the hill tribes of Vietnam, northeast Cambodia, and Laos.  These tribes consider the "old growth" or evergreen areas as primary forest whereas the tangent deciduous areas with less valuable timber are  secondary forest.  The primary forest is normally left undisturbed and reserved for hunting, fishing, gathering activities, and most importantly a place of dwelling for ancestral spirits.  Crop fields are generally cleared only in the secondary areas

A field is farmed for only 3-5 years then fallowed for 20-25 years during which time reforestation occurs replenishing soil fertility.  Except for the one currently being cultivated, the fields in a farmer's rotational system are in various stages of reforestation.  If a field is farmed too long, the soil fertility becomes severely degraded which allows the Imperata Cylindrica weed to take over.  These weeds prevent the recolonization of trees and the forest patch becomes wasteland. 

Once swidden communities are established, unless war, famine, etc. forces them to move elsewhere, clearing additional fields is only necessary to accommodate population growth.  However due to the very primitive living conditions of these peoples, their natural mortality rates are higher and life spans shorter which constrains population growth to far less than the mainstream cultures in their areas.   As well, some of these swidden cultures minimize sex until a child is wanted.

Migrants & Deforestation

In the 1970's and 80's some western environmentalists and forestry managers began slamming shifting cultivation as wasting resources and causing deforestation hence the derogatory phrase "slash and burn agriculture".  Indeed irreversible deforestation does occur when migrants and peasants from other areas move into an agroecosystem.  They're primarily motivated in meeting immediate economic needs and have no interest in sustaining the forest or desire to adopt the lifestyle of the integral swiddener.  About the only thing they get right is "slash and burn" otherwise they engage in sedentary farming or permanent cultivation as practiced in their areas of origin.  The soils become totally exhausted and the opportunist or "partial" swiddener abandons his field.  Soil fertility exhausted, Cogon Grass or  Imperata Cylindrica  invades the field and prevents recolonization of trees causing deforestation and wasteland.  The environmentalists were correct but only with regards to such migrants.

Following the 1975 communist victory in Vietnam, that government began resettling millions of lowland Vietnamese into the hill tribe forests of the Central Highlands.  These lowlanders became partial or itinerant swiddeners as described above.  This plus the clearing of forests for massive state-run coffee plantations brought about the demise of that agroecosystem and forced those hill tribes into sedentary farming.  A political motivation was also involved through the communist policy of Cultural Leveling which is designed to eliminate all ethnic minority cultures. 

Governments in other developing countries used the outcry of these environmentalists as an excuse to outlaw swidden farming.  In reality most of these regimes couldn't have cared less about deforestation rather they viewed burned trees as lost timber export revenue. 

As time passed objective analysis of shifting cultivation emerged proving that "slash and burn agriculture" was
a bad rap as regards integral swiddeners and their agroecosystems actually contribute to forest preservation. 

Shifting cultivation however requires a low population density to allow adequate land for all participants.  The world is growing smaller at a rapid pace and land pressures will continue forcing migrants into the few remaining agroecosystems.  But the greatest threat is ecological and culturally damaging commercial exploitation and logging operations.  If these tropical forests and the integral swiddeners who steward them are to be preserved,
the governments of these developing countries require incentives and pressure.

One such mechanism is the 1998 U.S. Tropical Forest Conservation Act  (TFCA) based on former President Bush's 1991 Enterprise for the Americas Initiative (EAI).  The TFCA enables bilateral agreements with developing countries whereby their U.S. concessional debt is reduced to generate funds for social and forest preservation programs; such agreements are referred to as "debt for nature swaps".  Of the nine developing countries with TFCA agreements, the closest to Cambodia is the Philippines.


T
he greatest damage thus far to the hill tribe agroecosystem in Mondolkiri and Ratanakiri Provinces, Cambodia is caused by the Yali Falls Dam hydroelectric plant on the Se San River and population growth upstream in Vietnam.  The Sen San originates in Vietnam and runs west through southern Ratanakiri Province to the Mekong River.  The Se San is now very polluted and the lives of some 55,000 mostly hill tribes people in Cambodia have been severely disrupted.  Since 1999 the unannounced and erratic water releases from the dam have caused flash flooding downstream which has drowned 36 people and countless livestock; as well, these people have suffered millions of dollars in damage to houses, farm fields, fishing boats, and livelihoods.  The Cambodian and Vietnamese Governments have done nothing to address this situation moreover Vietnam plans to build more such dams on the Se San. 

Otherwise since 1998 the population of Mondolkiri Province, Cambodia has increased by 38% due primarily to Khmer migration from the lowlands.  Most are peasants who as mentioned above clear forest land and practice sedentary farming resulting in deforestation.
   Without an educated infrastructure and education in general, these hill tribes will never gain influence in government and development decisions which impact their lives and ecology.  Their agroecosystem will vanish just as it did in Vietnam and once the habitat is destroyed so too a culture from which we can learn so much.

One should readily appreciate why the hill tribe existence requires living in small hamlets or isolated.  In Mondolkiri this results in at least 41% of children living beyond walking distance to government primary schools.  Of those who do attend primary school and finish, only the few at our one homeless child shelter have access to the middle and high schools in the province capital.  The situation is much the same in Ratanakiri to the north where the population is threefold and there is no homeless child shelter.

 

  Educational Constraints
Mondolkiri Province

Since 1999 the number of primary schools in Mondolkiri increased from 30 to 61.  There are middle schools in each of the four district towns and one in the province capital along with the only high school.  Our child's shelter is located adjacent to middle and high schools in the province capital.

The populations of the Mondolkiri Province capital and the four rural district towns are almost exclusively Khmer; most all are merchants, local government officials, and military personnel, and all are prosperous relative to the rural people.  As mentioned the hill tribes live throughout the hinterland where proximity to primary schools is spotty and distances to middle schools and the high school are insurmountable.  To illustrate, currently there are 8,425 students in the 61 primary schools yet only 148 students enrolled in the five middle schools.  Oddly there are 678 students in the one high school.

Subtracting the combined primary, middle, and high school enrollments of 9,251 from the Mondolkiri age 5-19 population of 15,670 leaves 6,419 or 41% of school age children who are not in school.  Some may have completed primary school but can not attend a middle school due to lack of proximity; or, more likely the 41% never entered primary school.  Since the rural population consists almost exclusively of hill tribes, their children comprise the overwhelming portion or possibly all of this 41%.  

There are 98 villages in the province therefore 37 do not have primary schools.  A “village” however for government administrative expediency includes the numerous hamlets within it’s economic sphere which range from one to several miles from the village proper.  Oftentimes the cumulative population in the surrounding hamlets exceeds that of the village proper.  If all 98 villages had a primary school, certainly the 41% not in school would be significantly less but many children in remote hamlets would remain beyond walking distance.  Presently (2005) 14 Mondolkiri primary schools are being upgraded by the Asian Development Bank and the World Bank.

Summary

An innovative program is required to take formal education into the rural areas of Mondolkiri and Ratanakiri, Cambodia where there are no schools.  Moreover it should address the larger socio economic problems which plague these hill tribes and make them vulnerable to the forces of development and outsiders who now want their land and timber.  Our program can accomplish these objectives and serve as a complement to government education provided we can develop and fund the human resources to staff it.  These teachers and advocates must be indigenous to the area and there are plenty of orphans and impoverished youngsters who are eager to have mattered and can be educated and trained for these roles.

In June, 2005 I learned of a four-year $30 million USD World Bank grant program to greatly enhance education in under served rural areas throughout the country.   I'm due to meet with these officials in August to try and obtain support for our program. 

Please see Objectives & Needs

1.  Food & Agriculture Organization (FAO), United Nations, Katherine Warner, Rome, 1991

home    |   contact us